Skip to content
SigmaMyself logoSigmaMyself
How the work is built

Useful advice should show its foundation.

SigmaMyself combines firsthand experience, practical frameworks, and outside research. These standards explain what readers should—and should not—expect from every article.

01 Experience

Personal lessons are labeled as personal lessons.

Articles may draw from real experience in health, family life, engineering, building software, money, and personal change. A result that worked for one person is not presented as a universal guarantee.

02 Evidence

Factual claims should lead readers to credible sources.

When an article depends on medical, psychological, financial, or technical claims, the goal is to link to primary research, government guidance, or recognized expert organizations. Sources support the claim; they do not replace professional advice.

03 Clarity

The practical answer comes before the performance.

Each guide is designed to state its bottom line early, use descriptive headings, and end with a realistic next action. Length is earned by usefulness—not by filler.

04 Updates

Strong articles are improved at the same URL.

Material revisions receive a visible updated date. Existing evergreen URLs are preserved whenever possible so readers, links, and search engines keep one stable version of the resource.

05 Independence

Promotion does not erase judgment.

When SigmaMyself discusses a product built by the author—such as Signalysis—that relationship is disclosed directly. A tool is never a substitute for independent judgment, and educational market content is not investment advice.

06 Corrections

Accuracy matters more than defending an old sentence.

When a meaningful error or outdated claim is identified, the article should be corrected and its updated date changed. Readers can use the contact channel listed on the About page to flag an issue.